Stockopedia | Share Prices, Share News and Company Research

How does Magic Formula Investing Work?

Wednesday, Apr 20 2011 by
10
How does Magic Formula Investing Work

In Brief

Magic Formula Investing is a value investing strategy based on buying 20-30 "good, cheap companies" defined as having the best available combined ranking in terms of earnings yield and a return on capital.

Background

A widely respected hedge-fund manager, Joel Greenblatt started as a value purist but was influenced by Warren Buffett's view about growth being part of the value equation. He founded Gotham Capital, a fund which apparently returned over 40% annualized from 1985 to 2005. By 1995, it had returned all money to its outside investors. He has authored two books, You Can Be A Stock Market Genius and New York Times bestsellier,  “The Little Book That Beats the Market”, and is also adjunct professor at Columbia University Business School. Greenblatt espouses MFI as a do-it-yourself version of the approach he has used while amassing his investment track record. With the “Little Book”, Greenblatt wanted to write a book his children could read and learn from. The main point Greenblatt makes is that investors should buy good companies at bargain prices.

Magic Formula Investing uses return on capital and earnings yield as its inputs. Return on capital is seen as the best determinant of whether a business is a good one or not. Companies that can earn a high ROC over time generally have a special advantage that keeps competition from destroying it (e.g. name recognition, a new product that is hard to duplicate or a unique business model).

Earnings yield is the metric that shows whether a company is cheap or not. Greenblatt says that stock prices of a firm can experience “wild” swings even as the value of the company stays relatively constant giving investors opportunities to buy low and sell high. 

Calculation / Definition of the Magic Formula 

  • Define minimum Market Capitalization that meets your liquidity needs. Greenblatt used a market capitalization floor of $50 million, but advised that you can set the minimum as high as $5 billion.
  • Sector Filter: Due to their unique financial structures, all stocks in the financial and utility sectors are excluded. 
  • Calculate Earnings Yield = EBIT / enterprise value.
  • Calculate Return on Capital = EBIT / (Net fixed assets + working capital)
  • EY Rank: Rank the stocks in descending order based on Earnings Yield and assign a rank number to each.
  • ROC Rank: Rank the same stocks in descending order based on Return on Capital and assign a rank number to each.
  • Add the rankings and select stocks that have the lowest combined ranking score. So a company that is ranked 358nd best in terms of ROC and 122rd highest in EY would gets a better combined ranking (i.e. 470) than a company that is ranked 1st in ROIC but only 950th best in EY (i.e. 951).

As noted elsewhere, one of the advantages of the MFI’s relative approach is that the system never runs out of investment candidates. Several value investment strategies have become de facto obsolete over time. For example, whereas Ben Graham successfully searched for so-called “net nets” more than a half-century ago, such companies have become virtually extinct today. By contrast, MFI simply ranks public companies relative to each other. There is no absolute cheapness requirement.

Portfolio Construction

Once the ranking has been developmed, Greenblatt suggests constructing a 20- to 30-stock portfolio by selecting five to seven stocks every two to three months over a 12-month period. He suggests that each stock should be sold after one year, repeating the steps to reinvest the proceeds of securities sold. This approach should be continued over a long-term (3-5+ year) period. In taxable accounts, he suggests paying attention to aftertax returns and timing the sales accordingly. 

 Special Offer: Invest like Buffett, Slater and Greenblatt. Click here for details »

Geek Stuff

Here are the key definitions – in general, trailing twelve month numbers from the income statement are used or the latest quarterly numbers for balance sheet figures.

  • Enterprise value = Equity market value of equity (including preferred stock) + interest-bearing debt - excess cash. If the returned value for Enterprise value is negative, then a default value of 0 is used.
  • EBIT = Pretax Income + Interest Expense. 
  • ROC = EBIT / (Net Working Capital + Net Fixed assets)
  • Net Fixed Assets (or property, plant and equipment after depreciation) = Total Assets - Total Current Assets - Total Intangible assets/goodwill
  • Net Working Capital = Max(Total Current Assets - Excess cash - Non-interest Bearing Payables,0). A maximum function is used as Joel Greenblatt has hinted that he uses zero when net working capital is negative.
  • Non-interest bearing payables = Total Current Liability – Interest Bearing Payables (i.e., short-term debt). This is one way to estimate NIBP via deduction, unless it is directly available.
  • Excess Cash  = Max(Total Cash – LTM Sales * 5%, 0). Excess cash is a matter of debate, since Joel Greenblatt has not answered any questions regarding how this is calculated.  The cash to sales ratio seems to be the most common measurement of “needed” cash, with the ratio typically in the 3% to 10% of sales, hence 5% is used as a blended average.  Another approach advocated here is Excess Cash = Total Cash - MAX(0; (Current Liabilities - Current Assets + Total Cash))

Does Magic Formula Investing work?

Greenblatt claims in his book that the Magic Formula has averaged a 17-year annual return of 30.8% and beats the S&P 500 96% of the time. However, this is a theoretical average, based on purchasing all stocks that show up on the screen every day for 17 years. In practice investors do not do this, rather accumulating 2-3 positions per month over a 12-month period. You can see further theoretical returns on Formula Investing.com. On a more practical level, reliable data on Greenblatt’s complete track record is not available. However, from 1985-1994, Greenblatt managed the Gotham Partners hedge fund, reporting annualized returns of over 40% (after expenses, before performance fees). 

How can I run this Screen? 

On Stockopedia PRO, of course! Sign up now for access to our exclusive Beta!

Watch Out For

The list of candidates generated by the MFI screen is likely to make an investor’s stomach churn. Many companies are either in out-of-favor industries or have major company-specific issues. While many investors recognise theoretically that buying good companies when they are out of favor is a path to long-term outperformance, a much smaller number would actually be willing to follow such a strategy. In the book, Greenblatt  make clear that the strategy is not a “magic bullet” that always works. During the 1988-2004 period studied by Greenblatt, MFI handily outperformed the S&P 500, yet the strategy experienced two non-overlapping three-year periods of underperformance. Sticking to a strategy that is not working in the short run even if it has a good long-term record can be difficult, Greenblatt says, but he believes that you will be better off doing just that than following the latest fad.

From the Source

Magic Formula Investing is described in depth in Greenblatt’s "The Little Book That Beats the Market". There is also the official site which includes a screener for the US market based on minimum market capitalization (any number between $50 million and $5 billion). Joel Greenblatt has partnered with another investment manager to offer FormulaTrading.com, a managed account for those who wish to implement the “Magic Formula” but do not want to manage on their own.

Other Sources


Filed Under: Value Investing,


Find out which companies are qualifying for the
Greenblatt's Magic Formula.

View Qualifying Companies

There's value in the stock market
but do you know where to look?

Get the most concise synopsis of everything that's been proven to work in value investing. If you like your stocks cheap you've found a treasure trove distilled to under 70 pages.

  • How to find ultimate Bargain Stocks with Ben Graham
  • How to spot Turnarounds and avoid Value Traps
  • From Graham to Greenblatt via Piotroski & Lakonishok
  • How to value stocks and set a margin of safety

Soon to be retailing for an RRP of £14.99, for a limited time only,
you can get your copy free by joining our 35,000 strong mailing list.

*By signing up you'll be joining our mailing list
no junk, no spam - just great content like this example.


Disclaimer:  

As per our Terms of Use, Stockopedia is a financial news & data site, discussion forum and content aggregator. Our site should be used for educational & informational purposes only. We do not provide investment advice, recommendations or views as to whether an investment or strategy is suited to the investment needs of a specific individual. You should make your own decisions and seek independent professional advice before doing so. Remember: Shares can go down as well as up. Past performance is not a guide to future performance & investors may not get back the amount invested.


Do you like this Post?
Yes
No
10 thumbs up
0 thumbs down
Share this post with friends




9 Comments on this Article show/hide all

general2011 22nd Apr '11 1 of 9
3

If you like Magic Formula, then you'll definitely like a recent find of mine: Edata. Registration is required, but it's free. I've used SharelockHolmes to create my list in the past, but this site looks a better bet.

Here's the top 5 stocks: CPP CPP Group), AZN (AstraZeneca), WMH (William Hill), PIC (Pace), JD. (JD Sports Fashion). Personally, CPP is a tricky one, and I'd be very very wary of investing in it if you wanted to run a concentrated portfolio. It has been floated for just over a year, and recently dived because it "warned on profits following the launch of a Financial Service Authority investigation into one of its products". FT Alphaville

| Link | Share
harryr 24th Apr '11 2 of 9
6

If one wants to make real money on the stockmarket, buy tiny low cap stocks that are growing at the speed of light.

I highlighted NTA that 5 baged last year and IDG that has doubled.

Today take a look at PFO who trade on a pe of 2.!!

The stockmarket is very good at putting the wrong price on a stock, here your have a stock worth in my view 10 times its price TODAY.

Growth, big profits tiny debt and falling.

These are my own views that in the past have done me very well indeed.

Take Zero notice of the crap posted on the Magic formula, its all a case of buying cheap and selling dear.!!

| Link | Share | 2 replies
nicole 24th Apr '11 3 of 9
1

In reply to harryr, post #2

You obviously haven't read the book or the article then. The Magic Formula maintains that you buy cheap stocks - that's the whole point.

| Link | Share
harryr 24th Apr '11 4 of 9
6

No not read the book, never read books.

To my mind you just buy stocks that others price wrong.

Take PFO today on a pe of under 2 when the market trades on a pe of 12.

Then go hunting for the reasons why its on a pe of 2

The only reason ANY stock is on a pe of 2 is if profits are falling or have fallen.

PFO has profits going through the roof, with 80% of shareholders in firm hands.

However do not take my word for it just watch the stock over the next few days/weeks.

| Link | Share
nigelpm 24th Apr '11 5 of 9
4

In reply to harryr, post #2


Today take a look at PFO who trade on a pe of 2.!!

The stockmarket is very good at putting the wrong price on a stock, here your have a stock worth in my view 10 times its price TODAY.

Growth, big profits tiny debt and falling.


PER valuations shouldn't be taken on their own - you need to look at the rest of the business including its historic performance of which PFO has very little.

| Link | Share
Dave Brickell Stockopedia Staff Member 11th May '11 6 of 9
1

One thing that seems a bit of a mystery with the Magic Formula is how to deal with intangibles in the ROCE calculations. In the Little Book, it's clear that Greenblatt excludes intangibles since he talks about the return on tangible capital. However, the rationale he gives for this is really only related to goodwill, as you can see here.

Does that mean that other more meaningful intangibles like copyrights, patents and customer lists should/could be kept in there? For certain types of companies, intangibles are definitely part of the productive assets of the company, so I don't follow the rationale for always excluding them (if that's what he's saying but I can't really tell). 

Website: Stockopedia PRO
| Link | Share | 1 reply
Mark Carter 20th Aug '11 7 of 9

Should we include or exclude the following components of Net Fixed Assets: investment properties, investments, other financial assets, other non-financial assets?

How about current asset investments?

| Link | Share
seasons 21st Apr 8 of 9

In reply to Dave Brickell, post #6

Dave,

Have you seen the book "Quantitative Value: A Practitioner’s Guide to Automating Intelligent Investment and Eliminating Behavioral Errors".. I found it on http://greenbackd.com/. I was wondering if I will be able to implement those rules on StockoPedia as they are based on Greenblatt's rules, which are rather rankings!

| Link | Share | 1 reply
Murakami Stockopedia Staff Member 21st Apr 9 of 9
1

In reply to seasons, post #8

Hi, it's a great book/synthesis of the topic - it covers quite a lot of similar ground to what we cover on Stockopedia. I am not sure if we will be modelling it precisely (as we try to focus on primary material by either experienced practitioners or academics) but we already model most, if not all, of the key references it cites, e.g. the Piotroski F-Score or the Novy-Marx Gross Profit to Assets ratio - http://www.stockopedia.co.uk/ratios/gross-profit-to-assets-5365/ . It's also helped to inspire some in-progress work we're doing on Composites Ratios - see: http://help.stockopedia.co.uk/knowledgebase/articles/182732-how-do-you-calculate-the-valuerank-

| Link | Share

What's your view on this article? to Comment Now

 
 
You are feeling neutral

Use the £ sign in front of a ticker to turn £VOD into Vodafone PLC

You can track all @StockoChat comments via Twitter


About Stockopedia Features

Stockopedia Features covers in-depth stories on strategies, companies and themes that are relevant to online investors. Investing is hard work. We don't try to over-simplify complex concepts - we prefer to try to help you navigate the detail.  more »


Stock Picking Tutorial Centre



Stock Picking Simplified

Stockopedia takes your stock picking to the next level with cutting edge Stock Reports & Screening tools.