Incidental stuff

could be as simple as getting the drc people onside incase they strike big, showing how they can fast track a development like cnv and deal with a large project like tgt. This could be housing few headstone. Could be anything at this point.

k

Hi kenobi
" This could be housing few headstone"

..umm not sure I understand ?

Though an African farm in for PV into Soco's acreage to sweeten some sort of deal with them is not without precedent!

In reply to kenobi, post #1022

.....getting the drc people onside incase they strike big

Hi K,

That's an interesting perspective.  For sure they're not doing it for nothing.

In the meantime roll on CNV gas/liquids conclusion and the reserves update.

fuiseog

In reply to rhomboid1, post #1023

sorry, rhomboid, I was on a tablet, and it seems to have auto corrected without me noticing !
I was trying to say is that this could easily be some jolly, DRC people to vietnam. I wondered whether some people had mis read it and thought it was chinese people (democratic republic of china or something), which might be much more significant.

I'm just not getting too excited about this sort of thing, if anything comes of it fine, but lets not get too excited.

cheers K

In reply to fuiseog, post #1025

Hi fuiseog,

hope all is well with you, I was just trying to say it could be as simple as dreambuilding the drc people and keeping them on side, perhaps there's other acreage they fancy in drc ? getting the people on side is one of the things they are good at.

yes the real significant issue is the reserves update, hopefully we'll hear something on that front before too long,

K

Hi fuiseog/kenobi,

Agree that the DRC angle is probably 'nice to know' rather than 'need to know'.....

Soco itself downplayed its takeup of Ophir (ex DPL's) stake in Block V (didn't RNS it, AFAIAI, just mentioned it in passing in the latest interim statement), where it now has 85%. Soco paid $6.5 + $2.2M ie $8.7M for the extra stake, whilst Ophir's interims show that they booked an impairment loss of $0.4M on the same asset.

From OPHR's perspective, this may just have been a tidying up exercise (they also exited their peripheral/inherited(?) assets in Uganda in the same reporting period), from SIA's perspective this could be a useful bolt-on. Remember too that RC is/was Non-exec Chair of DP, source of OPHR's stakeL......so may have a better handle on what Block V might be worth.

It may also be that DPL has some legacy '' favours' owing in DRC...whilst Soco is sure to need some local DRC 'goodwill' to get its increased acreage ratified and again to get any subsequent sell-down (to VN perhaps ?) approved......

ATB
You can tell that I'm (a) bored and (b) a frustrated Kremlinologist ! Where's davjo when you need him ?!

In reply to extrader, post #1028

Soco itself downplayed its takeup of Ophir (ex DPL's) stake in Block V (didn't RNS it, AFAIAI, just mentioned it in passing in the latest interim statement), where it now has 85%. Soco paid $6.5 + $2.2M ie $8.7M for the extra stake, whilst Ophir's interims show that they booked an impairment loss of $0.4M on the same asset.

It was simply an opportunity that came up. They will likely farm down again at a premium. At this stage no-one has much idea what Block V is worth - but it is a cheap option to have.

As to DRC visiting VN, there are all sorts of potential possibilities....but IIRC getting things done ahead of time and on budget is the sort of lesson that the DRC could well be interested in learning! ;-)

Meanwhile, I see that the heat to light ratio on other boards has risen.......but I see little worth commenting on ahead of the news re CNV.

ee

Anyone seen ee ? His favourite analyst at RBC Downgrades Soco back to reality...

FLASH: RBC Capital Markets downgrades SOCO International from outperform to sector performer, target price cut from 450p to 400p

http://www.stockmarketwire.com/article/4439418/FLASH-RBC-Capital-Markets-downgrades-SOCO-International-from-outperform-to-sector-performer-target-price-cut-from-450p-to-400p.html

In reply to Isaac, post #1030

If he's got any sense he'll be enjoying a pleasant game of golf in the sun, and ignoring the stream of pointless personal attacks that the RBC report seems to have set off on the BBs

I don't post very often because of my day job and I don't usually have anything worth saying.

However, for the first time ever, I thought I'd email SOCO International (LON:SIA) to see if they were in a position to comment on whether there is an independent review of reserves and its timing. This is their reply:

Thank you for your enquiry through our website.  We can confirm that there is an independent assessment underway of the Company’s reserves.  As of our meeting with them this week, it appears that they are about 75% complete, which is in line with our expectation of having a report sometime in November.  Obviously we cannot comment on the outcome of the study because it is not complete.  However, we can say that the Company’s purchase of the minority interest in SOCO Vietnam should give you an indication of our confidence regarding the reserves in Vietnam.

 

Should you require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact us.

 

Kind regards

SOCO Enquiries Team

I think I will continue to take the same position as ee, and ignore the analysts.

Best wishes,

Xig

In reply to xigris, post #1032

...I don't usually have anything worth saying.

Have you met Isaac? :)   Thanks for the info, it's reassuring to see some confirmation.

In reply to xigris, post #1032

Xig,

This is of course completely consistent with the responses given to a number of other people who have asked similar questions since the interims (albeit that I haven't seen November specified previously). I'm in little doubt that the (potentially) relatively extended timeline is due in part to the difficulty of deciding when enough production data has been acquired to draw some good conclusions about connectivity...and no doubt this issue forms a big part of the 25% incomplete and is the subject of ongoing meetings.

ee

Thanks Xig and ee,

I like the fact that 75% into the reserves update process, the company are still pointing at the purchase of the minority interest as a sign of their confidence in a positive upgrade. Had their confidence shown signs of being misplaced as the audit of reserves has progressed, perhaps they might not still be drawing a shareholder's attention to this?

If connectivity takes longer to prove and a big upgrade takes longer to count...heck, I don't mind waiting until Christmas. The only downside is the strong impatience:noise correlation on these boards.

I think I might have just broken the pointless speculation rule.

Mark

In reply to emptyend, post #1034

.....and no doubt this issue forms a big part of the 25% incomplete and is the subject of ongoing meetings.

And quite possibly the 25% still to be done is the trickiest part of the total exercise.

I suspect the quote of 75% complete may be misleading anyway and not to be taken too literally........many who have been involved in projects will be aware of the 80/20 rule: 80% pf the work takes 20% of the time, and the last 20% of the work takes 80% of the time. I'm just happy it's being done and we're getting positive noises from the company - if November becomes January, so be it.

Redhill

In reply to redhill, post #1036

And quite possibly the 25% still to be done is the trickiest part of the total exercise.

I suspect the quote of 75% complete may be misleading anyway and not to be taken too literally........many who have been involved in projects will be aware of the 80/20 rule: 80% pf the work takes 20% of the time, and the last 20% of the work takes 80% of the time.

Certain to be true, IMO, especially given the connectivity comments.

Purm also makes a perfectly logical point.

Time isn't crucial - but getting a decent assessment may well be. But I'd still stick with the thought that if I were a buyer I wouldn't be wanting to wait for the i's to be dotted and the T's crossed on this report - I'd be getting a deal done rather than risk losing out.

ee

Buying the minority interest is certainly a vote of confidence, from Soco management, and I too am hopeful of a big reserve upgrade. However you also have to ask why the seller of the minority interest sold. They were AIUI party to equal info as Soco at the time and so one would expect that they would not have sold if they were of the opinion that a large upgrade was pending.

To be fair though the price paid for the minority interest seemed more than fair even if no reserve upgrade happens.

Despite what people might think I'm pretty bullish on the Soco share price. Having said that I think it pays to remain sceptical until the facts are out in the open, rather than paying up front for any upside (not that this is the case here anyway).

Log

Hi Log

The minority interest's cost apportionment was racking up compound interest IIRC which may have made a deal more of a win/win , more speculatively we are also not privy to the small print which may have a cap on the size of the carry forward which may have been relevant if a reserves upgrade necessitates more CAPEX

Cheers

Buying the minority interest is certainly a vote of confidence, from Soco management, and I too am hopeful of a big reserve upgrade. However you also have to ask why the seller of the minority interest sold. They were AIUI party to equal info as Soco at the time and so one would expect that they would not have sold if they were of the opinion that a large upgrade was pending.

Yep! Just like one questions why PTTEP walked away prior to the last drill on TGD I remain very sceptical. And I really disregard comments made off the records to private  investors at the AGM.

The management really need to use the appropriate forms of communication, which is via a RNS. It really is not that difficult to message to the markets that Soco are reviewing reserves and they expect news in November.

However, management choose not to. One has to ask WHY? Maybe as they lack confidence in the size of any potential upgrade or perhaps even consider it not to be material.

So it begs the question why do certain people think we are due a significant upgerade that is material to the NAV?

The assets are worth what someone is prepared to pay for them. I think Soco should do a deal with the highest bidder, I think this is probably the best time in a LONG time to sell the company given where Oil price is, buoyant stock markets and steady but decent growing production from Soco.

These days I hardly call any management up in any of my shares, I mean what do you expect them to say other then what you want to hear? So what is the point? It is only worth calling to get clarification on an RNS/or improve ones understanding else I think one should make their decisions based on the information communicated via the right channels.

In reply to Isaac, post #1040

However, management choose not to. One has to ask WHY?

It is very straightforward from where I sit. Why encourage people to move in and start trying to buy you out before you have all the ammunition you need to have such discussions?

The other explanation is that they have already got a deal lined up in principle (subject to a bunch of conditions, the most important of which would be the reserves assessment). But I'm sure you'd all be rushing to dismiss that as hogwash ......:-)

begs the question why do certain people think we are due a significant upgerade that is material to the NAV?

..because some "certain people" engage their brains and pay attention to things that have been said to others*, as well as the large amount of information (re OOIP etc) that is in the public forum.

*I've heard nothing at all directly, but there are multiple sources including a number of people here....and you are welcome to disregard such comments if you wish.

These days I hardly call any management up in any of my shares

I'm sure that comes as a massive relief. Perhaps they will be able to get on with their jobs......

ps....re rhomboid's point about compound interest, my understanding is that the carry for the minority would have taken at least another 2-3 years to work off, due in part to compound interest at 9% having been charged on the funding of the minority for the last decade+.