Stockopedia | Share Prices, Share News and Company Research

Valuation, sentiment, and SP direction

Wednesday, Jun 17 2009 by
15

Detailed discussion of Soco's assets should take place on other threads, but this thread is to discuss the latest valuations both by ourselves and analysts, sentiment (ie will the shares go nowhere because there's not much upcoming news) and likely moves in the share price in the next six months.  How should the shares be valued?  How reasonable is it that any drilling without a firm commitment further than several months away is ignored by the market?

I haven't seen many recent analysts' reports on Soco, but I have one from Cazenove with a core NAV of 1370p and no doubt considerable explo NAV on top of that.  I imagine that's approximately concensus, but maybe with crude rising again these concensus NAV figures will start to rise.  Has anyone any other recent broker estimates?

My view, as stated elsewhere, remains that in the absence of much to get the market excited the shares will wander aimlessly for the rest of 2009.  I've previously guessed that if crude were $65 at Christmas 09, then Soco's SP would be somewhere near £13 then, and I'm still very happy with that guess.  What does anyone else think?

Of course unexpected bids and other events may overtake this, but these sort of events may happen to any company, and perhaps Soco (where management seem unlikely to accept bids since they believe there is considerable value not recognised by the market) is one of the less likely companies to be affected by the unexpected.  The key new news for Soco might be (a) a bid (IMO unlikely), (b) some sort of presentation by management of the drilling data they claim to have that demonstrates a significant strike has been made at E, currently ignored by the mkt, or (c) possibly hitting oil off the Congo.

 

Moderation note: posts will only be deleted from this thread by the site admins or by agreement from at least three of sirlurkalot, emptyend, djpreston and doverbeach.  If three of this list agree to delete a post, the names of those three and the reason for deletion will be noted in a post on this thread so everything's completely transparent.


Disclaimer:  

As per our Terms of Use, Stockopedia is a financial news & data site, discussion forum and content aggregator. Our site should be used for educational & informational purposes only. We do not provide investment advice, recommendations or views as to whether an investment or strategy is suited to the investment needs of a specific individual. You should make your own decisions and seek independent professional advice before doing so. The author may own shares in any companies discussed, all opinions are his/her own & are general/impersonal. Remember: Shares can go down as well as up. Past performance is not a guide to future performance & investors may not get back the amount invested.


Do you like this Post?
Yes
No
21 thumbs up
6 thumbs down
Share this post with friends



SOCO International plc is an international oil and gas exploration and production company. The Company has oil and gas interests in Vietnam, which includes Block 9-2 and Block 16-1; Republic of Congo (Brazzaville), which includes Marine XI Block and Marine XIV Block, the Democratic Republic of Congo (Kinshasa), consists of Nganzi block and Block V and Angola, which include Cabinda Onshore North Block. The Company's operations are located in South East Asia and Africa. It holds its interests in the Republic of Congo (Brazzaville), through its 85%-owned subsidiary, SOCO Exploration and Production Congo SA (SOCO EPC). It holds its interests in the Democratic Republic of Congo (Kinshasa) through its 85%-owned subsidiary SOCO Exploration and Production DRC Sprl. Te Giac Trang (TGT) field’s Phase I production began on August 22, 2011. Total production net to its working interest from continuing operations, during the year ended December 31, 2011, were 5,437 barrels of oil equivalent per day. more »

Share Price (Full)
400.9p
Change
2.0  0.5%
P/E (fwd)
7.8
Yield (fwd)
n/a
Mkt Cap (£m)
1,330



  Is SOCO International fundamentally strong or weak? Find out More »


1121 Posts on this Thread show/hide all

Isaac 18th Apr '12 402 of 1121
10

In reply to loglorry, post #397

What price would you sell your non-core position Isaac and why if you don't mind me asking?

I don't have a price in mind to offload my trading position. I think around 300p is too cheap to offload it though,. I want a bigger win & that requires patience. My preference is to offload after a decent move up, 10% in two days is not bad...

But one has to bear in mind why it went to 266p in the first place and I believe it was because someone decided to hit stop losses causing a spike down in the price, one that lasted less then two hours which makes me think especially with management willing buyers of the stock up to 290p that to get the price below this level will probably be difficult and there will be few opportunities to pick up stock in the 260-290p range IMO.

With the stock only about 9p or so above what management are prepared to buy and provide good support I see low risk opportunity to make more money and as such it does'nt make sense to flip so quickly only to hope you will get your next decision right in your next stock.....

I say this despite having a very overweight position, but over the next 6+ months I see the fundamentals further improving with ramp up of  Phase 1+2 TGT which again makes the risk relatively low.....

And I suspect management are'nt buying shares at £2.90 so they can offload for a 10% gain, I think their end price is much higher, perhaps 100% so what may appear clever now by selling may look silly in 6 months.

 

| Link | Share
redhill 18th Apr '12 403 of 1121
6

In reply to emptyend, post #400

Not so much a trading position as a day-trading position.....

Surely there's no minimum time to hold a trading position?

| Link | Share | 1 reply
emptyend 18th Apr '12 404 of 1121
3

In reply to redhill, post #403

Maybe not - but the shorter one comes, the closer to it being a blind gamble rather than a "trade".

I'm a great deal more impressed with Isaac's rationale for his trade than loglorry's.

| Link | Share
kenobi 19th Apr '12 405 of 1121
1

yes maybe traded too soon, but with the markets as they are, I don't blame you for taking a profit. Who knows what the future will bring ? I'm not talking about SOCO specifically but the market. There are risks, the EZ issues are still there, who knows if they'll be an opportunity to buy back in at that price again ?

I have on several occasions bought and thought, I won't get a chance to buy at these levels again, most recently before the last results, then after the last results I thought the share price would gradually progress over the summer leading up to tgt phase 2, so there you go, don't take trading advice from me !. So in my view there's no harm trading a bit in and out, (do as I say, not as I do, I can assure you it's more profitable !)

K

| Link | Share
jseth123 19th Apr '12 406 of 1121
4

I don't see any problem with trading out the next day for a 10% profit knowing you'd be happy to hold the shares for much longer if you needed. It's only gambling if one day is the maximum you would be willing to hold them IMO.

I'm keeping the ones I bought at 271p though.

| Link | Share
loglorry 20th Apr '12 407 of 1121
4

I'm a great deal more impressed with Isaac's rationale for his trade than loglorry's.

A great investor once said "Play the ball not the man".

LOL!

| Link | Share | 1 reply
emptyend 20th Apr '12 408 of 1121

In reply to loglorry, post #407

I'm a great deal more impressed with Isaac's rationale for his trade than loglorry's.

A great investor once said "Play the ball not the man".

I was commenting on the rationale. You should both be grateful that was all I was commenting on.....

| Link | Share
loglorry 20th Apr '12 409 of 1121
1

have a rec as a sign of gratitude.

| Link | Share
Spurticus 23rd Apr '12 410 of 1121
5

FWIW:
http://af.reuters.com/article/energyOilNews/idAFL3E8FN7UW20120423

* TENDERS
- Vietnam's PV Oil sold TGT crude for June loading at steady to higher premiums on robust demand for the distillate-rich, low sulphur grade, traders said. A recovery in gasoil margins could have lifted the value of the crude while buyers also preferred Vietnamese crude priced on dated Brent instead of the Minas formula, which has surged recently, one source said.
Three, 300,000-barrel cargoes were sold to SK Energy and Shell at premiums between $6.50 and $8.00 a barrel to dated Brent, the sources said.

Shame there isn't more being sold.

 

| Link | Share | 1 reply
emptyend 23rd Apr '12 411 of 1121
5

In reply to Spurticus, post #410

Three, 300,000-barrel cargoes were sold to SK Energy and Shell

Interesting. Buried in the Annual Report (p83) is a summary of sources of revenue.....based on the final destination of oil and gas sold.

South Korea (SK) in fact bought less crude in 2011 than in 2010 (so presumably are also a buyer of CNV crude). Vietnam continued to be the largest customer (as in 2010)....but with a smaller share of production (26% in 2011). The three largest non-Vietnam customers were all new in 2011 (and therefore one can infer they are buying TGT crude):

China - 23%

Malaysia - 19%

Japan -11%

S. Korea - 7%

Good premia continuing too.....$6.50-$8.00

| Link | Share
Isaac 23rd Apr '12 412 of 1121
6

I think I am reasonable person, it is difficult for me not to credit the management on their buy back programme. The level of patience they have in waiting for the price to dip below £2.90 and then buying back shares is pure genius IMO.

 

More shares bought back today, it is very pleasing how well IMO the buy back is executed. I'd rather they kept buying back shares and ramping up TGT then do anymore wild cat drilling tbh. It is probably the best way to increase NAV with hardly any risk.....

 

http://uk.advfn.com/news/UKREG/2012/article/52112568

 

Transaction in own shares

SOCO announces that on 23 April 2012 it purchased 80,926 of its ordinary shares at an average price of 289.1502 pence per ordinary share. The highest price and the lowest price paid for these shares were 290 pence and 288.3 pence respectively. All the purchased shares will be held as Treasury shares.

Following the above purchase, SOCO holds 2,999,013 ordinary shares as Treasury shares. The total number of ordinary shares in issue is 337,831,439 (excluding ordinary shares held as treasury shares).

| Link | Share
Isaac 23rd Apr '12 413 of 1121
7

What it does go to show though is that there MUST be a clear strategy for undertaking a programme of buybacks - and IMO this is the case regarding SOCO's plans. The fact that many of us (myself included) may wish the company to be more aggressive suggests that the company's approach is not merely opportunistic but is part of a careful plan. I'd be expecting to see the shape of that plan start to emerge in the coming weeks (starting with the TGD decision - which should be clear within the week).

ee from ADVFN

Interesting comments from ee, I don't disagree with this view that there is a plan behind the buy backs. It is part of the reason why I am reluctant offload shares for a quick profit and have been a keen buyer in the last month of Soco stock.

If one reads the takeover RNS published by VOD which is looking to buyout CWW it states :

 

Under the terms of the Offer, CWW Shareholders will be entitled to receive 38 pence in cash for each CWW Share held, representing a premium of approximately:

-         92 per cent. to the Closing Price of 19.8 pence per CWW Share on 10 February 2012 (being the last Business Day prior to the commencement of the Offer Period); and

-         107 per cent. to the average Closing Price of 18.4 pence per CWW Share for the three months ended 10 February 2012.

http://www.investegate.co.uk/Article.aspx?id=201204230700188298B

Which is why I think Soco will be reluctant to see the shares significantly below £2.90 & will buy back shares to support the price, a takeout price of £6/ share represents a 107% premium to what the company is currently trading at.

I don't think that would be difficult for an acquiror to convince their own stakeholders to back a takeout at such a premium IMO.

 

 

 

 

 

| Link | Share | 1 reply
emptyend 24th Apr '12 414 of 1121
4

In reply to Isaac, post #413

Yes, once again I find myself in agreement with Isaac - though we don't need to look outside the sector for large premia, given that premiums of up to 140% have been paid in recent memory. Indeed there is another example this morning from Shell's bid for Cove:

The Offer values the entire issued and to be issued share capital of Cove at approximately £1,120 million and represents a premium of: * 134 per cent. to the Closing Price of 94 pence per Cove Share as of 12 December 2011, the last Business Day prior to the date of the announcement by Cove of its proposed sale of the Rovuma Area 1 Interest; * 95.6 per cent. to the Closing Price of 112.5 pence per Cove Share as of 4 January 2012, the last Business Day prior to start of the Offer Period

There is quite a good piece from Edmond Jackson here, which reaches a sensible conclusion despite wooly/misleading comments about Director buying and only an oblique reference to the underlying endgame.

It is merely a matter of twiddling one's thumbs for long enough and refusing to get bored.....even if that doesn't naturally suit the mentality of those who prefer to trade actively.

ee

| Link | Share
djpreston 24th Apr '12 415 of 1121
11

I've been twiddling my thumbs so long now that I've got arthritis...

Will Ed and Roger pay me industrial compensation?

:-)

| Link | Share | 1 reply
emptyend 24th Apr '12 416 of 1121
1

In reply to djpreston, post #415

:-)

Patience, LukeSkywalker - or you won't become Jedi.......

| Link | Share
emptyend 26th Apr '12 417 of 1121
8

Interesting move just announced re TGT crude sales. Not sure what the implications are, other than confidence over maintaining production:

Vietnam's PV Oil has offered Te Giac Trang crude for loading from July to December in the first term tender for the grade, a trade source said.
Buyers will be required to place bids for a minimum 6,700 barrels per day of TGT in the tender that will close on May 10, the source said. Bids will remain valid until a day later.
The producer is offering the grade on a term basis as the production volume is high and has stabilised, the source said.
| Link | Share | 1 reply
Spurticus 26th Apr '12 418 of 1121
1

In reply to emptyend, post #417

"as the production volume is high and has stabilised"

Good news.

But I wonder if that's stable at PV's version of 'high', or mine.

| Link | Share | 1 reply
emptyend 26th Apr '12 419 of 1121
7

In reply to Spurticus, post #418

But I wonder if that's stable at PV's version of 'high', or mine.

Well I suspect it may be both - in that phase 2 is/was scheduled to come onstream in August....but we know from jimbly on ADVFN today that:

H4 progresses:
http://www.baobariavungtau.com.vn/en/oilgas/97076/index.brvt

"On April 20, EPC contractor - Petroleum Equipment Assembly & Metal Structure Co.,Ltd (PVC-MS) - and Hoang Long Joint Operating Company (Hoang Long JOC) jointly celebrated one million man hours without LTI (lost time incidents) for the H4 topside project, the component of WHP - H4 - Te Giac Trang field.

The WHP- H4 topside consists of 4 main decks, weighing 2,100 tons. After nearly 10 months of fabrication, the Te Giac Trang – WHP - H4 has achieved the milestone of 1 million man-hours without LTI. Regarding workload, PVC-MS reached 99.77% of onshore fabrication, exceeding 1% of the schedule set out. As planned, at the end of May 2012, WHP-H4 topside will complete the onshore fabrication, loadout and continue to sail out for offshore installation. However, to meet the requirements of schedule for WHP-H4 production, PVC-MS has launched an emulation to shorten construction time for loadout WHP-H4 topside on 09-05-2012."

...FWIW

....which might imply that the capability for 55,000 bopd is being brought forward into July (whether or not they perf the Miocene in the phase 1 wells).

And in turn that might imply that the reservoir management discussions have been progressing in the right direction (and just possibly there may be some news in the offing on that front?)

Whatever the case, it seems to be that positive moves are in process.

| Link | Share
kenobi 4th May '12 420 of 1121
2

Well it was a disappointment to hear that TGD had been dropped. I do wonder how much of it was down to what might be perceived as a worsened working relationship with PV, regarding production on TGT. And why would we punt 10's M of dollars for the 3rd (4th if you count the very first abandoned drill), on a new licence no longer recoverable against TGT production, when the upside might be reduced by what soco clearly think is over caution by PV.
Anyway, thats all in the past, but what it did make me think is that perhaps, part of the decision was to do with other options that they might have elsewhere. Perhaps, better terms or chances of success can be had elsewhere with the same amount of money (we have to accept TGD was hard and expensive to drill ).

So maybe there is other potential upside opportunities elsewhere that we are not aware of yet ?
or of course the other option that they think they are closer to a deal for SOCO vietnam than think.
It has been suggested that they cannot be in discussion with anyone for the sale of the company as they are buying back shares. BUT, if they are considering discussing the sale of Soco Vietnam, the sale of a non wholely owned subsidiary would that still apply ? I don't know.

I would have thought later in the year or 6 months after start up of tgt p2 would be the most likely timescale for sale, which I guess puts us at the start of 2013, but it's all a guess, and I won't pretend I have any particular insight.

My point in this post was really , lets not be downhearted about TGD, (better to have loved and lost ??!!??), there may be a lot of other fish in the sea !!

have a good week end every body,

K


| Link | Share
loglorry 4th May '12 421 of 1121
3

Well I just bought a few Soco at 286p same reason as last time to add to my core holding. I'll probably get slated for making another quick 10% in a matter of days but again I think it is a decent short term strategy with the buy back in place and the very solid asset backing. We'll see how it works out but I expect them to be back around 305p quite shortly where i'll take a quick profit. I'll keep my core holding intact though and wait for a bid around the 400-450p mark.

Log

| Link | Share | 2 replies

What's your view on this thread? to Comment Now

 
 
You are feeling neutral

Use the £ sign in front of a ticker to turn £VOD into Vodafone PLC

You can track all @StockoChat comments via Twitter

 Are SOCO International's fundamentals sound as an investment? Find out More »





Stock Picking Tutorial Centre


Related Content
Analysts reports
Analysts reports
SOCO International 6th Aug '09

Incidental stuff
Incidental stuff
SOCO International 21st May '09

2012 Final results
2012 Final results
SOCO International 11th Mar




Stock Picking Simplified

Stockopedia takes your stock picking to the next level with cutting edge Stock Reports & Screening tools.