Stockopedia | Share Prices, Share News and Company Research

Don't miss out on our free "How to Make the Most of Stockopedia" Webinar this Wednesday May 29th - sign up details here



Fork it!

Trading below Cash Screen 12 Qualifying in UK

This screen is loosely based on the "Cash Index" approach outlined by James Altucher in his book, "Trade Like Warren Buffett". He suggests a multi-pronged approach to analysing potential bargain/arbitrage stocks in times of market distress (post 2001 bubble / Iraq War). First of all, he suggests that it's important to recognise that these stocks are likely to be trading for less than cash for a reason, namely the mar­ket thinks they will eventually declare bankruptcy. Some of the possible risks include: i) Inaccurate reflection of "cash on hand" in their books (leases, severance packages, etc), ii) Business model destined to fail, iii) Management with no incentive to return value to shareholders. To minimise risk of buying a turkey, Altucher looks for eight factors: i) Market cap below cash, ii) Very low leverage, iii) Enough cash headroom to cover the current annual burn-rate, and iv) some stability in revenues and earnings. In addition to these easily-screenable criteria, he suggested looking out for more qualitative factors: v) A reasonable belief that the sell-off in the stock was partly irrational, vi) Favorable arbitrage analysis - , i) Insider buying and viii) Institutional ownership.  To learn more about this strategy please click here »

Picture of James Altucher

About James Altucher

American hedge fund manager, author and blogger.

Trade Like Warren Buffett

by James Altucher

In his book, "Trade Like Warren Buffett", Altucher indicates that his basket of stocks was up over 100% over six months, "as the market not only jolted upwards in the aftermath of the Iraq War but also began to realize the value of the cash portfolios of these companies". The long-term performance of this screen - and its performance in more benign market conditions - is unknown.

This screen is based on a UK dataset. It uses the following criteria:

  • Mkt Cap £m > 0
  • Debt To Assets < 33
  • EPS > EPS PTTM
  • Sales (Local) > 0.9 * Sales PTTM
  • Price to Cash Net of Burn < 1

Results are sorted by:

  • Price to Cash Net of Burn in ascending order


And limited to the first 200 Results


Can these rules be improved? Submit a suggestion »
Want to make your own version? Create a Fork!

Trading below Cash Screen Graphical History in

Returns

Timeframe Screen Returns FTSE 100 Outperformance
1 week 2.66% -0.50% 3.2%
1 month 3.43% 3.87% -0.4%
3 months -1.40% 5.03% -6.4%
6 months 13.64% 14.35% -0.7%
1 year 9.53% 26.35% -16.8%
Since inception 14.79% 24.0% -9.2%
Annualised 10.03%

Risk

Maximum Drawdown-21.63%
Average No. of Holdings15.4
Diversification LevelGood

 Chart based on an equal weighted portfolio of max 25 stocks rebalanced quarterly. Qualifying shares below updated daily. Past performance not indicative of future returns.


Please subscribe to see the companies that qualify for the Trading below Cash Screen Strategy.
Plans start from as little as 24.99 per month. 14 day FREE TRIAL available.

12 Qualifying in

Ticker Name Mkt Cap £m Debt To Assets EPS EPS PTTM Sales (Local) Sales PTTM Price to Cash Net of Burn
Subscriber Subscriber  
Subscriber Subscriber  
Subscriber Subscriber  
Subscriber Subscriber  
Subscriber Subscriber  
Subscriber Subscriber  
Subscriber Subscriber  
Subscriber Subscriber  
Subscriber Subscriber  
Subscriber Subscriber  
Subscriber Subscriber  
Subscriber Subscriber  
COMPARE

Can't see the share you expect? View this screen as a checklist to find out why.

You should consider the results of any screening process, including this one, as candidates for further research, not as a buy list. Screening helps to narrow a search based on pre-defined criteria. It is not a substitute for independent research reflecting your individual criteria for investing/trading. Please note that the screening criteria used represents Stockopedia's interpretation of the author's investment approach and are not determined or endorsed by the original strategist.